The first half of 2020 has been a busy and challenging time for everyone, and I hope you are all keeping safe and well and looking after each other. We now have almost 20,000 registered paramedics. Over 17,000 paramedics successfully renewed their registration for the first time in October and November last year, and the renewal process has told us that some paramedics still don’t fully understand the requirements and obligations that come with being a registered health professional.
The Paramedicine Board will be seeking to guide and support you by providing more information and resources. We have published information on our website aimed to enhance your understanding of continuing professional development (CPD) and recency of practice requirements, which we suggest you take the time to review. Read more below on our plans for the rest of the year.
I recommend you also keep up to date with the latest advice from state, territory and Commonwealth governments on the current pandemic, protecting yourself and others including appropriate infection control measures and any additional advice applicable for health sector employees.
It is important for all of us to be vigilant, to take care and be safe.
Associate Professor Stephen Gough ASM
Chair, Paramedicine Board of Australia
Back to top
Throughout the rest of this year the Paramedicine Board will continue to develop and implement the infrastructure necessary to regulate the profession. This will include:
We will also consult on a shared supervised practice framework and registration standards for limited registration. Keep an eye on our website for news about these and other developments.
All registered paramedics must complete 30 hours of suitable CPD activities each year to comply with the CPD registration standard for paramedics. It is understandable that some paramedics have found the transition to registration challenging and to support you the Board has published resources to help you comply with your CPD requirements. These include:
You can find these on the Board’s website under Registration standards/CPD.
There are several reasons why the Paramedicine Board may impose a condition on a practitioner’s registration that their practice be supervised for a period of time. Often it is to provide a safe and controlled environment for that practitioner to establish their ongoing competence to practise as a paramedic.
When the Board imposes a supervised practice condition, the paramedic must not practise outside the arrangements specified in the condition. Usually the paramedic will be required to submit and have a supervised practice plan that details their supervised practice arrangements, approved by the Paramedicine Board, before they can begin to practise.
Paramedics who practise without having their supervised practice arrangements approved by the Board should note that this may be grounds for notification under s144 of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (National Law) and subsequent disciplinary action may be taken.
If you delay the start of a period of supervised practice, in addition to having your supervised practice arrangements approved, you must also ensure you meet requirements of the Board’s Recency of practice registration standard before starting practice.
There are obligations that come with being a registered paramedic. These include:
Also, if you change your principal place of practice, name or address you must notify the Board within 30 days.
Failure to meet these requirements may result in health, conduct or performance action being taken under Part 8 of the National Law.
There are forms to help you make these declarations when required − see the Registration section of the Ahpra website.
A profession-specific statistical summary and a report from the Chair that covers the work of the Paramedicine Board of Australia over the 12 months to 30 June 2019 is available online. The summary draws on data from the 2018/19 annual report of Ahpra and the National Boards.
The paramedic summary provides a snapshot of the profession as at 30 June 2019 and includes the number of applications for registration and segmentation of the registrant base by gender and age.
Notifications information is also extensive and includes numbers, types and sources of complaints, mandatory notifications, criminal offence complaints and more.
To gain an insight into the profession during 2018/19 and to access the data tables visit the Board’s 2018/19 summary.
The Paramedicine Board’s registration data report is released quarterly. The latest report, for the period 1 January to 31 March 2020, shows there are 19,383 registered paramedics, 212 of whom have non-practising registration.
The highest number by age group is 25-29 years. The gender balance is 44.2% female (8,562), 55.8% male (10,807).
For more information on registration, visit our Statistics page.
On 1 July 2019, the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic) began operation in Victoria. The Paramedicine Board draws specific attention to section 8 of the Act, which states that a registered health practitioner who provides health services or professional care services to a person must not, in the course of providing those services to the person:
A breach of this requirement is deemed to be unprofessional conduct for the purposes of the National Law (s 8(3)). It is noted, however, that section 8 does not prevent a health practitioner providing information about voluntary assisted dying to a person at that person’s request (s 8(2)) (emphasis added).
We encourage Victorian health practitioners who have not already done so, to review the Act and familiarise themselves with its requirements.
If you need further information, we encourage you to contact your professional association or professional indemnity insurer. Information about the Act, published by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, is available on the DHHS website.
The Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC) has endorsed the Australian national guidelines for the management of healthcare workers living with blood borne viruses and healthcare workers who perform exposure prone procedures at risk of exposure to blood borne viruses that were developed by the Communicable Diseases Network Australia (CDNA).
To support the implementation of the CDNA guidelines and paramedics who may perform exposure-prone procedures, the Paramedicine Board of Australia, together with the Dental, Medical, Nursing and Midwifery and Podiatry Boards, has approved Guidelines for registered health practitioners and students in relation to blood-borne viruses.
There is a risk of transmission of a blood-borne virus from practitioner to patient when health practitioners who are living with a blood-borne virus perform a class of procedures called ‘exposure-prone procedures’.
When referring to blood-borne viruses, we mean hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Exposure-prone procedures are procedures where there is a risk of injury to the healthcare worker resulting in exposure of the patient’s open tissues to the blood of the healthcare worker. These procedures include those where the healthcare worker’s hands (whether gloved or not) may be in contact with sharp instruments, needle tips or sharp tissues (spicules of bone or teeth) inside a patient’s open body cavity, wound or confined anatomical space where the hands or fingertips may not be completely visible at all times.
These guidelines have been developed to:
These guidelines will be published shortly. To read the public consultation paper and the submissions received in the consultation, visit Past consultations on the Board’s website.
National Boards and Ahpra have published a new guide to help registered health practitioners understand and meet their obligations when using social media. The guide reminds practitioners that when interacting online, they should maintain professional standards and be aware of the implications of their actions, just as when they interact in person.
The guide does not stop practitioners from engaging online or via social media; instead, it encourages practitioners to act ethically and professionally in any setting.
To help practitioners meet their obligations, the guide also outlines some common pitfalls practitioners may encounter when using social media.
Community trust in registered health practitioners is essential. Whether an online activity can be viewed by the public or is limited to a specific group of people, health practitioners have a responsibility to behave ethically and to maintain professional standards, as in all professional circumstances.
In using social media, health practitioners should be aware of their obligations under the National Law, the Paramedicine Board’s Code of conduct, the Advertising guidelines and other relevant legislation, such as privacy legislation.
This guide replaces the Social media policy on Boards’ codes, guidelines and policies pages and is available in the Advertising resources section of Ahpra’s website. The guide will be updated as needed.
Ahpra has released many podcasts on areas of interest to all health professionals in the Taking care podcast series. The topics covered in the podcasts include pandemic and non-pandemic-related issues.
In a recent episode on Health practitioner wellbeing in the pandemic era and beyond, psychiatrist Dr Kym Jenkins, clinical psychologist Margie Stuchbery and Dr Jane Munro, a rheumatologist, share personal and professional insights on practitioner wellbeing. They discuss practical and evidence-based strategies to safeguard and support practitioners and teams through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
Ahpra releases a new episode every fortnight, discussing current topics and the latest issues affecting safe healthcare in Australia. Podcasts include:
Download and listen to the latest Ahpra Taking care podcast episode today. You can also listen and subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and by searching ‘Taking Care’ in your podcast player.
If you have questions or feedback about the podcast, email email@example.com.
National Boards, accreditation authorities and Ahpra, with the Australian Government through the Health and Education portfolios, have issued national principles for clinical education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This unique multi-sector collaboration to protect Australia’s future health workforce is helping students learning to become health practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic continue their studies and graduate.
Some student placements have been paused, cancelled or otherwise modified as health services respond to the pandemic. This has led to uncertainty and change for students and educators as education providers, accreditation authorities, clinical supervisors and others explore alternative options for students to progress towards graduation.
The principles aim to provide helpful guidance about how placements can occur safely, taking into account the significant changes across the health and education sectors due to COVID-19. Visit the National principles for clinical education during COVID-19 to find out more.
In April, the Australian Indigenous Doctors’ Association (AIDA) issued a media release detailing instances of medical practitioners denying Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people access to culturally safe healthcare. They were seeking testing for COVID-19. These cases in rural New South Wales and Western Australia involved refusal of care on the grounds of patient identity and racist stereotypes of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders not practising self-hygiene.
Racism from registered healthcare professionals will not be tolerated, particularly given the vulnerability of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples to the virus. They continue to experience prejudice and bias when seeking necessary healthcare. Discrimination in healthcare contributes to health inequity.
We encourage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who have experienced culturally unsafe incidents of care or refusal of care by a registered health practitioner to submit a notification or complaint to Ahpra.
In February 2020, the National Scheme’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and cultural safety strategy 2020-2025 was released, proving our commitment to achieving patient safety for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples as the norm and the inextricably linked elements of clinical and cultural safety. The strategy strives to achieve the national priority of a health system free of racism.
We remind all registered health practitioners that they are required to comply with their profession’s Code of conduct, which condemns discrimination and racism in health practice.
On 1 March 2020 the amendments to the National Law in relation to mandatory notifications took effect.
The amendments apply in all states and territories except Western Australia and affect the mandatory reporting obligations for treating practitioners.
The threshold for reporting a concern about impairment, intoxication and practice outside of professional standards has been raised. The threshold is now reached when there is a substantial risk of harm to the public.
The National Boards and Ahpra have jointly revised the mandatory notifications guidelines to reflect these amendments. The guidelines are relevant to all registered health practitioners, and registered students in Australia.
The guidelines aim to explain the mandatory notifications requirements in the National Law clearly so that practitioners, employers and education providers understand who must make a mandatory notification about a practitioner or student and when they must be made. They also aim to make it clearer when a notification does not need to be made.
Changes to the guidelines include the following:
To help explain the requirements and raise awareness, Ahpra and National Boards have released a range of information materials to both ensure patient safety and support practitioner wellbeing. Read the revised guidelines for practitioners and students and the additional resources developed to help explain mandatory notifications.
National Boards and Ahpra have welcomed two new policy directions from the COAG Health Council which reinforce that National Boards and Ahpra are to prioritise public protection in the work of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (National Scheme).
The two directions state that public protection is paramount and require consultation with patient safety and health care consumer bodies on any new and revised registration standards, codes and guidelines, as well as other considerations.
The first policy direction outlines the consideration that National Boards and Ahpra must give to the public (including vulnerable people in the community) when determining whether to take regulatory action about a health practitioner. It also authorises limited sharing of information with employers and state/territory health departments about serious matters involving the conduct of a registered health practitioner.
The second policy direction requires National Boards to consult with patient safety bodies and consumer bodies on registration standards, codes and guidelines when these are being developed or revised. It also provides that National Boards and Ahpra must:
In implementing these policy directions, National Boards and Ahpra will continue to ensure fairness for health practitioners in regulatory processes. The policy directions can be viewed on the National Boards and Ahpra websites.
An ambitious strategy from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health experts, regulators and health organisations committed to embedding cultural safety into the health system has been released by 43 entities including Ahpra and the National Boards.
The National Scheme’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and cultural safety strategy 2020-2025 is endorsed by organisations, academics and individuals, including the entities who set the education standards for the 183,000 students who are studying to become registered health practitioners and the regulators of Australia’s 750,000 registered practitioners.
The strategy focuses on achieving patient safety for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples as the norm and the inextricably linked elements of clinical and cultural safety.
Development of the strategy was led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations and individuals via the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Strategy Group, which represents all signatories to the strategy.
Patient safety for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples is the norm. We recognise that patient safety includes the inextricably linked elements of clinical and cultural safety, and that this link must be defined by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.
Cultural safety: A culturally safe health workforce through nationally consistent standards, codes and guidelines across all registered health practitioners in Australia.
Increased participation: Increased Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participation in the registered health workforce and across all levels of the scheme regulating registered practitioners nationally.
Greater access: Greater access for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples to culturally safe services from registered health practitioners.
Influence: Using the Strategy Group’s leadership and influence to achieve reciprocal goals. This includes developing a nationally consistent baseline definition to be used across the scheme regulating registered practitioners nationally, which has already been achieved in partnership with the National Health Leadership Forum.
As part of the strategy, we have already reached some goals:
For more information, read the media release.
Protected titles are an important public safety measure and we take their misuse seriously.
While we are unable to talk about individuals, we would like to thank everyone who has helped to promote a greater community understanding of the importance of protected titles and their appropriate use.
We have recently been working with media organisations to ensure they understand their legal obligations when using titles such as ‘nurse’, ‘medical practitioner’ or ‘psychologist’.
In Australia, titles that relate to a registered health profession are protected by law. You must be registered with a national health practitioner board (National Board) to use a protected title. To be registered, you must be suitably trained, qualified and satisfy the National Board’s requirements for continuing professional education, professional indemnity insurance and recency of practice.
To use a protected title when you’re not registered, or to hold someone else out as registered when they’re not, breaches the trust the public has in their registered health practitioners. That’s because when the public sees a protected title, they trust that they’ll be receiving safe and professional healthcare and advice.
Ahpra wrote to media organisations to remind them of their obligations under the National Law, and to advise that the easiest way to check if someone is registered to practise and entitled to use a protected title in Australia, is by checking our online register of practitioners. The register, which contains the most up-to-date information about a practitioner’s registration status, is available to members of the public, employers and third-parties. It’s free, available 24/7, with updates made daily.
If you are concerned that someone might be holding themselves out to be a registered practitioner when they’re not, call 1300 419 495 or notify us via the Ahpra website.
In February 2019, the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (Qld) was passed by the Queensland Parliament. The amendments included increased penalties and introduced an imprisonment term of up to three years for offences against the National Law. The penalties apply to offences committed after 1 July 2019.
The introduction of an imprisonment term means that some offences will automatically become indictable offences in all states and territories (except Western Australia).